From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, "Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Martin Blumenstingl" <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/33] mtd: rawnand: fsl_elbc: Let .probe retry if local bus is missing
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 19:19:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240122191931.17807644@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41a042207ef791c4c5bcb46f09f63c40c6aa321b.1705944943.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Hi Uwe,
u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de wrote on Mon, 22 Jan 2024 19:07:08 +0100:
> If during probe fsl_lbc_ctrl_dev is NULL that might just be because the
> fsl_lbc driver didn't bind yet. So return -EPROBE_DEFER in this case to
> make the driver core retry probing later.
Despite the probable usefulness of this change, I don't see any
relationship with the current series. So unless there is a good reason
I might take this one through the nand tree.
Also, what about a Fixes/Cc: stable tag here?
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-22 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 18:06 [PATCH v2 00/33] spi: get rid of some legacy macros Uwe Kleine-König
2024-01-22 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 12/33] mtd: dataflash: Follow renaming of SPI "master" to "controller" Uwe Kleine-König
2024-01-22 18:13 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-01-22 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 13/33] mtd: rawnand: fsl_elbc: Let .probe retry if local bus is missing Uwe Kleine-König
2024-01-22 18:19 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2024-01-22 21:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-01-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v2 00/33] spi: get rid of some legacy macros Mark Brown
2024-01-22 19:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-24 20:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-24 17:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-24 17:22 ` Mark Brown
2024-01-24 17:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-01 21:47 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-02-12 15:33 ` (subset) " Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240122191931.17807644@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox