From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
Cc: "Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Tudor Ambarus" <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
"Michael Walle" <michael@walle.cc>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
"Julien Su" <juliensu@mxic.com.tw>,
"Jaime Liao" <jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw>,
"Jaime Liao" <jaimeliao.tw@gmail.com>,
"Alvin Zhou" <alvinzhou@mxic.com.tw>,
eagle.alexander923@gmail.com, mans@mansr.com, martin@geanix.com,
"Sean Nyekjær" <sean@geanix.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: rawnand: Clarify conditions to enable continuous reads
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 20:39:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240213203922.27fb4884@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cce57281-4149-459f-b741-0f3c08af7d20@foss.st.com>
Hi Christophe,
christophe.kerello@foss.st.com wrote on Fri, 9 Feb 2024 14:35:44 +0100:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> I am testing last nand/next branch with the MP1 board, and i get an issue since this patch was applied.
>
> When I read the SLC NAND using nandump tool (reading page 0 and page 1), the OOB is not displayed at expected. For page 1, oob is displayed when for page 0 the first data of the page are displayed.
>
> The nanddump command used is: nanddump -c -o -l 0x2000 /dev/mtd9
>
> Page 0:
> OOB Data: 7f 45 4c 46 01 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |.ELF............|
> OOB Data: 03 00 28 00 01 00 00 00 a4 03 00 00 34 00 00 00 |..(.........4...|
> OOB Data: 7c 11 00 00 00 04 00 05 34 00 20 00 06 00 28 00 ||.......4. ...(.|
> OOB Data: 1b 00 1a 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
> OOB Data: 00 00 00 00 10 05 00 00 10 05 00 00 05 00 00 00 |................|
> OOB Data: 00 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 e8 0e 00 00 e8 0e 01 00 |................|
> OOB Data: e8 0e 01 00 44 01 00 00 48 01 00 00 06 00 00 00 |....D...H.......|
> OOB Data: 00 00 01 00 02 00 00 00 f0 0e 00 00 f0 0e 01 00 |................|
> OOB Data: f0 0e 01 00 10 01 00 00 10 01 00 00 06 00 00 00 |................|
> OOB Data: 04 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 f4 00 00 00 f4 00 00 00 |................|
> OOB Data: f4 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 |....D...D.......|
> OOB Data: 04 00 00 00 51 e5 74 64 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |....Q.td........|
> OOB Data: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 |................|
> OOB Data: 10 00 00 00 52 e5 74 64 e8 0e 00 00 e8 0e 01 00 |....R.td........|
>
> Page 1:
> OOB Data: ff ff 94 25 8c 3c c7 44 e7 c0 b7 b0 92 5e 50 fb |...%.<.D.....^P.|
> OOB Data: 80 ca a3 de e2 73 b4 4e 58 39 fe b4 85 76 65 31 |.....s.NX9...ve1|
> OOB Data: 48 86 91 f3 58 0b 59 df 2c 08 75 8b 6f 48 36 a6 |H...X.Y.,.u.oH6.|
> OOB Data: bc 16 61 58 db 52 08 75 8b 6f 48 36 a6 bc 16 61 |..aX.R.u.oH6...a|
> OOB Data: 58 db 52 08 75 8b 6f 48 36 a6 bc 16 61 58 db 52 |X.R.u.oH6...aX.R|
> OOB Data: 08 75 8b 6f 48 36 a6 bc 16 61 58 db 52 08 75 8b |.u.oH6...aX.R.u.|
> OOB Data: 6f 48 36 a6 bc 16 61 58 db 52 ff ff ff ff ff ff |oH6...aX.R......|
> OOB Data: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................|
> OOB Data: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................|
> OOB Data: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................|
> OOB Data: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................|
> OOB Data: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................|
> OOB Data: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................|
> OOB Data: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................|
>
> I have checked what is happening in rawnand_enable_cont_reads function,
> and for page 0, con_read.ongoing = true when for page 1 con_read.ongoing = false
>
> page 0:
> [ 51.785623] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: page=0, col=0, readlen=4096, mtd->writesize=4096
> [ 51.793751] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: end_page=1, end_col=0
> [ 51.799356] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: con_read.ongoing=1
>
> page 1:
> [ 53.493337] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: page=1, col=0, readlen=4096, mtd->writesize=4096
> [ 53.501413] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: end_page=1, end_col=0
> [ 53.507013] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: con_read.ongoing=0
>
> I do not expect con_read.ongoing set to true when we read one page.
>
> I have also dumped what happened when we read the bad block table and it is also strange for me in particular the value end_page.
>
> [ 1.581940] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xd3
> [ 1.581966] nand: Micron MT29F8G08ABACAH4
> [ 1.581974] nand: 1024 MiB, SLC, erase size: 256 KiB, page size: 4096, OOB size: 224
> [ 1.582379] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: page=262080, col=0, readlen=5, mtd->writesize=4096
> [ 1.582411] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: end_page=0, end_col=5
> [ 1.582419] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: con_read.ongoing=0
> [ 1.585817] Bad block table found at page 262080, version 0x01
> [ 1.585943] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: page=262080, col=0, readlen=5, mtd->writesize=4096
> [ 1.585960] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: end_page=0, end_col=5
> [ 1.585968] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: con_read.ongoing=0
> [ 1.586677] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: page=262016, col=0, readlen=5, mtd->writesize=4096
> [ 1.586700] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: end_page=0, end_col=5
> [ 1.586708] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: con_read.ongoing=0
> [ 1.587139] Bad block table found at page 262016, version 0x01
> [ 1.587168] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: page=262081, col=5, readlen=1019, mtd->writesize=4096
> [ 1.587181] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: end_page=0, end_col=1024
> [ 1.587189] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: con_read.ongoing=0
> [ 1.587672] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: page=262081, col=1024, readlen=5, mtd->writesize=4096
> [ 1.587692] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: end_page=0, end_col=1029
> [ 1.587700] rawnand_enable_cont_reads: con_read.ongoing=0
Interesting, I played with those corner cases in earlier tests but
for this series I was focused on playing with filesystems and the fact
that sometimes continuous read was very sporadically breaking, so I
played with much more complex patterns but I don't remember checking
these two basic cases again...
Sorry for the breakage, I will have a look and keep you updated. I
believe the continuous read feature is fine per se, but the problem
here is that there is a mismatch between the actual operation and the
continuous read configuration on "top" of it, which should in these
cases not be enabled at all.
I am away this week, I will look into this when I'm back.
Thanks for the useful report,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-13 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-15 12:32 [PATCH 0/4] mtd: rawnand: Fix sequential reads Miquel Raynal
2023-12-15 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] mtd: rawnand: Prevent crossing LUN boundaries during " Miquel Raynal
2023-12-22 11:37 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-12-15 12:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] mtd: rawnand: Fix core interference with " Miquel Raynal
2023-12-22 11:37 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-12-15 12:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] mtd: rawnand: Prevent sequential reads with on-die ECC engines Miquel Raynal
2023-12-22 11:37 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-12-15 12:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] mtd: rawnand: Clarify conditions to enable continuous reads Miquel Raynal
2023-12-22 11:37 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-02-09 13:35 ` Christophe Kerello
2024-02-13 19:39 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2024-02-21 11:20 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-02-21 16:29 ` Christophe Kerello
2024-02-21 16:53 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-12-21 10:06 ` [PATCH 0/4] mtd: rawnand: Fix sequential reads Martin Hundebøll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240213203922.27fb4884@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=alvinzhou@mxic.com.tw \
--cc=christophe.kerello@foss.st.com \
--cc=eagle.alexander923@gmail.com \
--cc=jaimeliao.tw@gmail.com \
--cc=jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw \
--cc=juliensu@mxic.com.tw \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mans@mansr.com \
--cc=martin@geanix.com \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sean@geanix.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox