From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: nand: mxc_nand: implement exec_op
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 09:32:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240513093256.363861d1@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240513091902.2c00d30a@xps-13>
miquel.raynal@bootlin.com wrote on Mon, 13 May 2024 09:19:02 +0200:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> > @@ -1717,9 +1465,111 @@ static int mxcnd_setup_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr,
> > return host->devtype_data->setup_interface(chip, chipnr, conf);
> > }
> >
> > +static int mxcnd_exec_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
> > + const struct nand_operation *op,
> > + bool check_only)
> > +{
> > + struct mxc_nand_host *host = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
> > + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> > + int i, j, buf_len;
> > + void *buf_read = NULL;
> > + const void *buf_write = NULL;
> > + const struct nand_op_instr *instr;
> > + bool readid = false;
> > + bool statusreq = false;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(host->dev, "%s: %d instructions\n", __func__, op->ninstrs);
>
> Maybe you want to get rid of this debug line.
>
> > +
> > + if (check_only)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < op->ninstrs; i++) {
> > + instr = &op->instrs[i];
> > +
> > + nand_op_trace(" ", instr);
> > +
> > + switch (instr->type) {
> > + case NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR:
> > + /*
> > + * NFC handles R/B internally. Therefore, this function
> > + * always returns status as ready.
>
> This is no longer a standalone function, maybe:
>
> "The controller handles the R/B pin internally, therefore there is
> nothing to do here."
And this is actually very wrong.
You should call wait_op_done() instead.
>
> > + */
> > + break;
> > + case NAND_OP_CMD_INSTR:
> > + if (instr->ctx.cmd.opcode == NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG)
> > + host->devtype_data->send_page(mtd, NFC_INPUT);
Actually this is not the right place. You should trigger the transfer
from controller SRAM to NAND (and the other way around) in the
NAND_OP_DATA_OUT_INSTR case.
Here you should just call ->send_cmd.
> > +
> > + host->devtype_data->send_cmd(host, instr->ctx.cmd.opcode, true);
> > +
> > + if (instr->ctx.cmd.opcode == NAND_CMD_READID)
> > + readid = true;
> > + if (instr->ctx.cmd.opcode == NAND_CMD_STATUS)
> > + statusreq = true;
> > +
> > + break;
> > + case NAND_OP_ADDR_INSTR:
> > + for (j = 0; j < instr->ctx.addr.naddrs; j++) {
> > + bool islast = j == instr->ctx.addr.naddrs - 1;
> > + host->devtype_data->send_addr(host, instr->ctx.addr.addrs[j], islast);
> > + }
> > + break;
> > + case NAND_OP_DATA_OUT_INSTR:
> > + buf_write = instr->ctx.data.buf.out;
> > + buf_len = instr->ctx.data.len;
> > +
> > + memcpy32_toio(host->main_area0, buf_write, buf_len);
> > + if (chip->oob_poi)
> > + copy_spare(mtd, false, chip->oob_poi);
>
> This copy should not be needed. It should be in your page accessors if
> needed.
>
> > +
> > + break;
> > + case NAND_OP_DATA_IN_INSTR:
> > +
> > + buf_read = instr->ctx.data.buf.in;
> > + buf_len = instr->ctx.data.len;
> > +
> > + if (readid) {
> > + host->devtype_data->send_read_id(host);
> > + readid = false;
> > +
> > + memcpy32_fromio(host->data_buf, host->main_area0, buf_len * 2);
> > +
> > + if (chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16) {
> > + u8 *bufr = buf_read;
> > + u16 *bufw = host->data_buf;
> > + for (j = 0; j < buf_len; j++)
> > + bufr[j] = bufw[j];
> > + } else {
> > + memcpy(buf_read, host->data_buf, buf_len);
> > + }
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (statusreq) {
> > + *(u8*)buf_read = host->devtype_data->get_dev_status(host);
> > + statusreq = false;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + host->devtype_data->read_page(chip);
> > +
> > + if (IS_ALIGNED(buf_len, 4)) {
> > + memcpy32_fromio(buf_read, host->main_area0, buf_len);
> > + } else {
> > + memcpy32_fromio(host->data_buf, host->main_area0, mtd->writesize);
> > + memcpy(buf_read, host->data_buf, buf_len);
> > + }
> > +
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> Otherwise I'm very happy with the look.
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-13 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-08 11:08 [PATCH v2 0/3] mtd: nand: mxc_nand: Convert to exec_op Sascha Hauer
2024-05-08 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: nand: mxc_nand: separate page read from ecc calc Sascha Hauer
2024-05-08 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: nand: mxc_nand: implement exec_op Sascha Hauer
2024-05-13 7:19 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-05-13 7:32 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2024-05-13 9:08 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-05-13 12:55 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-05-14 9:18 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-05-14 10:16 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-05-08 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: nand: mxc_nand: support software ECC Sascha Hauer
2024-05-13 7:42 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-05-13 9:19 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240513093256.363861d1@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox