From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: raw: gpmi: improve power management handling
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 17:28:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241003172820.50324192@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241003150500.uz2efay7kadu47if@cozumel>
Hi Han,
han.xu@nxp.com wrote on Thu, 3 Oct 2024 10:05:16 -0500:
> On 24/10/03 09:38AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Han,
> >
> > han.xu@nxp.com wrote on Wed, 2 Oct 2024 10:39:44 -0500:
> >
> > > The commit refactors the power management handling in the gpmi nand
> > > driver. It removes redundant pm_runtime calls in the probe function,
> > > handles the pad control in suspend and resume, and moves the calls to
> > > acquire and release DMA channels to the runtime suspend and resume
> > > functions.
> >
> > May I know the motivation to acquire and release the DMA channels
> > during suspend? In general it seems like a different change which I'd
> > prefer to see in its own commit with a justification. The rest looks
> > ok otherwise.
>
> Hi Miquel,
>
> Thanks for your comments. IMHO there is no much logic changes indeed, just move
> the dma channel acquire and release from system pm to the runtime pm, releasing
> the unused resources as early as possible. If you think it's necessary I will
> split the patch into two parts.
Actually I don't understand why these channels are released and
acquired again. Does it make sense to do that in the (runtime)
suspend/resume path? I'd be in favor of avoiding this extra
configuration which as a first sight does not seem required here.
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-02 15:39 [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: nand: raw: gpmi: switch to SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS Han Xu
2024-10-02 15:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: raw: gpmi: improve power management handling Han Xu
2024-10-02 16:23 ` Frank Li
2024-10-03 7:38 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-10-03 15:05 ` Han Xu
2024-10-03 15:28 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2024-10-03 20:05 ` Han Xu
2024-10-04 7:21 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-10-07 9:52 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241003172820.50324192@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=han.xu@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox