From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] loop: force GFP_NOIO for underlying file systems allocations
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:44:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250117074442.256705-2-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250117074442.256705-1-hch@lst.de>
File systems can and often do allocate memory in the read-write path.
If these allocations are done with __GFP_IO or __GFP_FS set they can
recurse into the file system or swap device on top of the loop device
and cause deadlocks. Prevent this by forcing a noio scope over the
calls into the file system.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
drivers/block/loop.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 1ec7417c7f00..71eccc5cfffb 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1905,6 +1905,15 @@ static void loop_handle_cmd(struct loop_cmd *cmd)
int ret = 0;
struct mem_cgroup *old_memcg = NULL;
const bool use_aio = cmd->use_aio;
+ unsigned int memflags;
+
+ /*
+ * We're calling into file system which could do be doing memory
+ * allocations. Ensure the memory reclaim does not cause I/O,
+ * because that could end up in the user of this loop devices again and
+ * deadlock.
+ */
+ memflags = memalloc_noio_save();
if (write && (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY)) {
ret = -EIO;
@@ -1942,6 +1951,7 @@ static void loop_handle_cmd(struct loop_cmd *cmd)
if (likely(!blk_should_fake_timeout(rq->q)))
blk_mq_complete_request(rq);
}
+ memalloc_noio_restore(memflags);
}
static void loop_process_work(struct loop_worker *worker,
--
2.45.2
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-17 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 7:44 annotate noio context Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-17 7:44 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-01-17 11:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] loop: force GFP_NOIO for underlying file systems allocations Ming Lei
2025-01-22 6:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-17 7:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: force noio scope in blk_mq_freeze_queue Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250117074442.256705-2-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox