From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@kernel.org>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: at91: remove unnecessary of_platform_default_populate calls
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 10:21:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260506152158.GA2136148-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260429-blazing-thus-c1a4eb9b6b0c@thorsis.com>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 03:02:22PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Hello Miquel,
>
> Am Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 11:42:19AM +0200 schrieb Miquel Raynal:
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > > [ 0.958298] bus: 'platform': add driver atmel-ebi
> > > [ 0.958451] platform 10000000.ebi: bus: 'platform': __driver_probe_device: matched device with driver atmel-ebi
> > > [ 0.958566] platform 10000000.ebi: error -EPROBE_DEFER: wait for supplier /ahb/apb/pinctrl@fffff400/ebi/ebi-data-lsb
> > > [ 0.958649] platform 10000000.ebi: Added to deferred list
> > > [ 0.959429] bus: 'platform': remove driver atmel-ebi
> > > [ 0.959540] driver: 'atmel-ebi': driver_release
> >
> > Interesting.
> >
> > If you look at the very last line of the driver, the EBI driver does not
> > use a standard "module_platform_driver" macro, it uses some kind of
> > run-once probe that is kept in an __init section:
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.0.1/source/drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c#L637
> >
> > And this seems to be incompatible with probe deferrals:
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.0.1/source/drivers/base/platform.c#L948
>
> Indeed. o.O
Saravana, Is there something we can do to make this issue more obvious?
>
> > I would suggest trying something alone these lines:
> >
> > --- a/drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c
> > @@ -633,5 +633,6 @@ static struct platform_driver atmel_ebi_driver = {
> > .of_match_table = atmel_ebi_id_table,
> > .pm = &atmel_ebi_pm_ops,
> > },
> > + .probe = atmel_ebi_probe,
> > };
> > -builtin_platform_driver_probe(atmel_ebi_driver, atmel_ebi_probe);
> > +builtin_platform_driver(atmel_ebi_driver);
> >
> > Memory taken by the probe function will remain mapped. That seems to be
> > the drawback.
>
> This works. Sent a patch, see:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260429125930.844790-1-ada@thorsis.com/
>
> Regarding the drawback: This can't be much memory, can it?
>
> Greets
> Alex
>
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-05 21:06 [PATCH v3 0/3] at91: Remove of_platform_default_populate() calls Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-01-05 21:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mtd: nand: atmel: Defer probe if SRAM is missing Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-01-05 21:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: at91: Move PM init functions to .init_late hook Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-01-05 21:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: at91: remove unnecessary of_platform_default_populate calls Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-04-23 8:24 ` Alexander Dahl
2026-04-24 10:56 ` Alexander Dahl
2026-04-27 15:07 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-04-29 8:02 ` Alexander Dahl
2026-04-29 9:42 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-04-29 13:02 ` Alexander Dahl
2026-04-29 14:31 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-05-06 15:21 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2026-01-10 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] at91: Remove of_platform_default_populate() calls Claudiu Beznea
2026-01-19 10:21 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260506152158.GA2136148-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox