From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB14B606A32D for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 09:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=u5FauzBQ DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Unsubscribe-Post:List-Owner; bh=45BlKlhrCk7+y/KS9/f7qTtR9dzWM6LaLjyf1RMal5E=; b=u5FauzBQZRVMAnXlG1pA2c1+Zu x9WG8WfSH4wsoLJ580nN3+CXYGp95fjsB85u/+H8HZBRe+WzXf7eBr2WbfuoNz2OlP/NfzAA8vor7 VGASdMPsMbBbj8t06lR21JlIGS2Ld02+HSrTEy9BxLebBCAJDUDKnjlRWkKuOtmNnoJVxeApN3rrm k+/eOfoqyvU4McPgkoclwHEKxKgps5V/rt2g3sj2PpjqQo0yBoxZtC2jsA8CqIc33fw86HdiJxY51 977Zk1mgwzXPTcIlikO68XsET0hQLxHCAkUmu+pGwAvmZrrSRKSCj0ei/ANY9rXfoavWHqLlCrCYt wVrpPZpg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.100.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xOAQW-00000001gRf-2isa; Tue, 03 Nov 2026 09:03:32 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.100.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xOAQS-00000001gPt-2OMB for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2026 09:03:30 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 5881F68B05; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 10:03:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 10:03:23 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Christian Brauner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Al Viro , ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, exfat@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, ntfs@lists.linux.dev, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, gfs2@lists.linux.dev, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 33/34] xfs: allow remounting read-only after a shutdown Message-ID: <20261103090323.GA5314@lst.de> References: <20261029-work-fs-sb_rdonly-v2-0-2f44f64f0b66@kernel.org> <20261029-work-fs-sb_rdonly-v2-33-2f44f64f0b66@kernel.org> <20261103054155.GB1559@lst.de> <20261103-galgen-ehebruch-stehen-a967c14ce53e@brauner> X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261103-galgen-ehebruch-stehen-a967c14ce53e@brauner> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20261103_010328_759401_E9A4B4D2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.54 ) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 09:41:58AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 06:41:55AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Btw, if my previous reply wasn't clear: please add the test for this > > to xfstests where they actually get run regularly and not the kernel > > selftests which for file systems are basically unused. > > > > Bonus points for having generic tests instead of purely file system > > specific ones. > > I can drop the tests from this series but xfstests for this will be a > follow-up. I'd much prefer to have one canonical place for the tests over having them in two places. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/