From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16dpjx-0003PI-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 09:42:13 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20020221095156.14464.qmail@web14701.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20020221095156.14464.qmail@web14701.mail.yahoo.com> To: Michael Michael Cc: Gad Hayisraeli , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Slow jffs2 startup on DOM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 09:53:27 +0000 Message-ID: <2193.1014285207@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: memmel2@yahoo.com said: > I think in this case its caused by the underlying block device > cleaning things up. Not JFFS2. I think he's right. I didn't think the DOM knew anything about when it was opened/closed by the operating system, so it didn't get a chance to behave differently on an unmount? It's just an IDE drive, isn't it? -- dwmw2