From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 178it6-0005qH-00 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 15:39:20 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20020517140033.25631.qmail@web21503.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20020517140033.25631.qmail@web21503.mail.yahoo.com> To: Studying MTD Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: FAT for NAND Flash Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 15:39:19 +0100 Message-ID: <2284.1021646359@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: studying_mtd@yahoo.com said: > I was asking these question because you told me that i have to add > translation layer for FAT. what i was thinking that, is it possible > that if i write only one translation layer which will be good for FAT > as well as it will replace NFTL. I don't understand what you're trying to say. Please could you rephrase it, preferably not making any reference at all to FAT, ext2, reiserfs or anything else which is not relevant because it's handled by an entirely separate layer. -- dwmw2