From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 176f9H-0002y6-00 for ; Sat, 11 May 2002 23:15:31 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <200205102135.g4ALZjP02377@tinman.seitzassoc.com> References: <200205102135.g4ALZjP02377@tinman.seitzassoc.com> To: Galen Seitz Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: can't rmmod cfi_cmdset_0002 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 23:15:29 +0100 Message-ID: <23062.1021155329@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: galens@seitzassoc.com said: > It appears from looking at the code that a call to cfi_cmdset_0002 > will result in the macro MOD_INC_USE_COUNT being executed twice, once > in cfi_cmdset_0002, and again in cfi_amdstd_setup. cfi_cmdset_0001.c > has a similar structure. Is this intentional? Not really, no. The modular stuff is a bit messy and wants attention. -- dwmw2