From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wj0-x242.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c01::242]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1cCTjB-0001ge-ET for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:56:55 +0000 Received: by mail-wj0-x242.google.com with SMTP id jb2so26896257wjb.3 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 07:56:32 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: Allocate bdi objects dynamically To: Sandeep Jain References: <1470319275-9465-1-git-send-email-Sandeep_Jain@mentor.com> <20161103113421.GA4873@mentor.com> <4055a3ed-c024-4c29-45e1-e600cdc5902e@gmail.com> <20161129081204.GA6617@mentor.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger , Steve Longerbeam , LKML , Jim Baxter , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse , Cyrille Pitchen From: Marek Vasut Message-ID: <2339c911-3399-e69b-aabc-f7d57d26af7d@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:39:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161129081204.GA6617@mentor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 11/29/2016 09:12 AM, Sandeep Jain wrote: > Dear Maintainers, > This patch is already reviewed twice with no issues. > Requesting your attention for patch merge. > > Thanks & Regards, > Sandeep Jain > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:22:31AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 11/03/2016 12:34 PM, Sandeep Jain wrote: >>> Dear Maintainers, >>> This patch is reviewed by Richard. >>> Requesting for Maintainer's attention for patch merge. >>> >>> Thanks & Regards, >>> Sandeep Jain >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 04:41:47PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Sandeep Jain wrote: >>>>> From: Steve Longerbeam >>>>> >>>>> The MTD backing dev info objects mtd_bdi was statically allocated. >>>>> So when MTD is built as a loadable module, this object fall in the >>>>> vmalloc address space. >>>>> >>>>> The problem with that, is that the BDI APIs use wake_up_bit(), which calls >>>>> virt_to_page() to retrieve the memory zone of the page containing the >>>>> wait_queue to wake up, and virt_to_page() is not valid for vmalloc or >>>>> highmem addresses. >>>>> >>>>> Fix this by allocating the BDI objects dynamically with kmalloc. The >>>>> objects now fall in the logical address space so that BDI APIs will >>>>> work in all cases (mtd builtin or module). >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Baxter >>>>> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Jain >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger >> >> I don't see any obvious problem either: >> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut Bump? -- Best regards, Marek Vasut