From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com)
	by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 17Lh2T-0002N7-00
	for <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 10:18:37 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <1024704926.2582.1.camel@devel> 
References: <1024704926.2582.1.camel@devel>  <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206211931530.18637-100000@server.superbt.com> 
To: Christopher Fowler <cfowler@outpostsentinel.com>
Cc: Ilguiz Latypov <ilatypov@superbt.com>,
    Linux MTD <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: X Windows Performance with DOC 2000 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 10:18:30 +0100
Message-ID: <24666.1024737510@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org
Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>

cfowler@outpostsentinel.com said:
>  Even if I could get it to work, I'm still going with CF. 

Nasty things have been said about CF reliability -- any reason you're not 
just using raw flash?

> M-SYS really needs to change the name Disk on Chip to Chip on Chip.  It is
> not seamless as their marketing department would like you to believe. 

It basically works. Making it work _seamlessly_ is as you say a marketing 
exercise, and one they don't seem too interested in for Linux.

--
dwmw2