From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17biac-0003gn-00 for ; Mon, 05 Aug 2002 15:12:06 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: References: To: joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Disk blocks for long periods Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 15:12:06 +0100 Message-ID: <25084.1028556726@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se said: > I am on PPC and SysRq-T does not display anything useful :-( Perhaps > readprofile? SysRq-T should work on PPC. It's mostly generic code. What's wrong with it? The profile _may_ help but it's most likely to tell us that the CPU spend most time sleeping, without actually telling us _where_ each process was sleeping. > Perhaps kupdate is holding some VFS specific block? I am on a MV > 2.4.2 kernel I'd care more if you could reproduce it with something a little more recent. I'm assuming you're using v1.100 of cfi_cmdset_0001.c, since you committed that change. -- dwmw2