From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 15aHgP-0003Dy-00 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:11:37 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20010824131854.1607.qmail@qis> References: <20010824131854.1607.qmail@qis> <20010824023928.3168.qmail@qis> <10297.998637309@redhat.com> To: "Nikolai Vladychevski" Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: mtdchar major , 90 or 91? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:17:33 +0100 Message-ID: <25311.998662653@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: niko@isl.net.mx said: > that's what I tought, last question, do you think I can use the > lastest cvs for production, or I should stay on 20000704..... (It's > just I wanted to use Ollie Who's new DoC millenium driver and be up > to date.....) Definitely use the latest CVS. -- dwmw2