public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@sigma-star.at>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
	Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@linutronix.de>,
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Benedikt Spranger <b.spranger@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: DENALI: can't detect NAND chip
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:21:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2538157.EbBc2oB3DW@blindfold> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180605093627.03ee6a95@bbrezillon>

Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2018, 09:36:27 CEST schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 10:43:49 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
> 
> > 2018-06-05 7:01 GMT+09:00 Richard Weinberger <richard@sigma-star.at>:
> > > Am Montag, 4. Juni 2018, 22:57:32 CEST schrieb Richard Weinberger:  
> > >> Am Montag, 4. Juni 2018, 22:51:17 CEST schrieb Boris Brezillon:  
> > >> > > According to the datasheet, the NAND clock rate should be 50Mhz, which is what
> > >> > > is returned in both cases.
> > >> > > So this does not really look invalid to me. :)  
> > >> >
> > >> > Did you try to put a scope on the RE or WE pin? The x2 factor looks too
> > >> > perfect to be just a coincidence.  
> > >>
> > >> Not yet, but you are right the x2 factor is really interesting.  
> > >
> > > The NFC uses two clocks, nand_x_clk and nand_clk.
> > > nand_clk is nand_x_clk / 4.
> > > In the device tree nand_clk is referenced, and therefore used to calculate
> > > the timings. So we might need to use the 200Mhz clock instead of the 50Mhz
> > > for the calculation.
> > >  
> > 
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> > 
> > Strictly speaking, the Denali IP takes three clocks.
> > 
> > [1] clk :     core clock
> > [2] clk_x:    bus interface clock
> > [3] ecc_clk:  for ECC engine
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Also in my SoCs (Socionext UniPhier),
> > 
> > clk = 50MHz,
> > clk_x = ecc_clk = 200MHz
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > In this case, the ->setup_data_interface hook
> > is interested in the frequency of [2] clk_x.
> > 
> > However, clk_x is not a core clock.
> > I admit this is confusing.
> > 
> > 
> > If we really want to make the DT-binding precise,
> > we can change the clock requirement like follows:
> > 
> > clock-names = "clk", "clk_x", "ecc_clk";
> 
> How about:
> 
> clock-names = "nand", "nand_x", "ecc";
> 
> The clk prefix/suffix is really redundant here.
> 
> > clocks = <...>, <...>, <...>;
> 
> If the IP really takes 3 different clks in input, then it should be
> represented like that.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > This might be an annoying churn, though...
> > 
> > 
> 
> I guess you're talking about backward compat with existing dtb. This
> should be a problem, and we can even fix the Richard's problem for
> those dtbs if we hardcode the nand_x_clk rate to 200Mhz when nand_x_clk
> is missing (see below).

[...]

Masahiro, which fix do you prefer?

We could also just fix the dts file.
e.g.
commit c0097d0b498bdefb427c352d615432e97f1998aa
Author: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Date:   Tue Jun 12 11:16:22 2018 +0200

    arm: dts: socfpga: Use right denali clock
    
    To calculate the timing parameters a 200MHz clock is needed, in case of
    socfpga this is nand_x_clk and not nand_clk.
    
    Cc: stable@kernel.org
    Fixes: 1bb88666775e ("mtd: nand: denali: handle timing parameters by setup_data_interface()")
    Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
index 486d4e7433ed..8fbddc2a5c33 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
@@ -754,7 +754,7 @@
 			reg-names = "nand_data", "denali_reg";
 			interrupts = <0x0 0x90 0x4>;
 			dma-mask = <0xffffffff>;
-			clocks = <&nand_clk>;
+			clocks = <&nand_x_clk>;
 			status = "disabled";
 		};
 
Thanks,
//richard

-- 
sigma star gmbh - Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 6 - 6020 Innsbruck - Austria
ATU66964118 - FN 374287y

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-12  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-12 14:29 DENALI: can't detect NAND chip Philipp Rosenberger
2018-03-13  8:48 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-06-04 19:58   ` Richard Weinberger
2018-06-04 20:34     ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-04 20:41       ` Richard Weinberger
2018-06-04 20:51         ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-04 20:57           ` Richard Weinberger
2018-06-04 22:01             ` Richard Weinberger
2018-06-05  1:43               ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-06-05  7:36                 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-05  7:54                   ` Richard Weinberger
2018-06-12  9:21                   ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2018-06-12  9:24                     ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-06-12  9:34                       ` Richard Weinberger
2018-06-12  9:29                     ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2538157.EbBc2oB3DW@blindfold \
    --to=richard@sigma-star.at \
    --cc=b.spranger@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=p.rosenberger@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox