From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16tceD-0007hF-00 for ; Fri, 05 Apr 2002 23:57:33 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <006401c1dbff$4550c830$7e0aa8c0@bridge> References: <006401c1dbff$4550c830$7e0aa8c0@bridge> To: "Jeremy Jackson" Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dmwm2@infradead.org Subject: Re: patch solving the wrong prolem? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 23:57:29 +0100 Message-ID: <25655.1018047449@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: jerj@coplanar.net said: > I guess I'm just trying to get in the loop... I could use some info > on what gets released where, when, etc. Mostly, the stuff in CVS is newer. Some people submit changes directly to Linus without bothering to Cc me, and those patches tend to take a lot longer to get merged. Periodically, I send the CVS code to Linus and/or Marcelo. I did some of that recently, and there's more to come. -- dwmw2