From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16UAFg-0003NE-00 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:35:00 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: References: To: acurtis@onz.com Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: JFFS2 and NAND Flash Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:45:11 +0000 Message-ID: <26037.1011980711@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: acurtis@onz.com said: > Could someone explain what the current limitations are implementing > JFFS2 on NANAD flash. I just made a recommendation to management to go > this way so I was surprised to see the prior posting. I would be > willing to fix this problem if a little background could be provided. http://mhonarc.axis.se/jffs-dev/msg01140.html -- dwmw2