From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16b1M2-0002s1-00 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:29:54 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <002001c1b0e5$7bda7bc0$7b00000a@SNAGGLE> References: <002001c1b0e5$7bda7bc0$7b00000a@SNAGGLE> To: "Christopher Hoover" Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Jeroen.Roose@chess.nl, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] New Lock and Unlock Code for Intel FLASH parts Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:41:00 +0000 Message-ID: <27071.1013614860@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: ch@murgatroid.com said: > I rewrote some of the locking and unlocking support for Intel parts > in drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c because it seemed completely > broken for parts with variable block sizes, such as the Intel C3 flash > I am using. passion /home/dwmw2/working/mtd/drivers/mtd/chips $ patch -p4 --dry-run < ~/Mail/inbox/504 patching file `cfi_cmdset_0001.c' Hunk #2 succeeded at 65 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 1079 with fuzz 1 (offset 25 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 1331 (offset 22 lines). Hunk #5 FAILED at 1407. Hunk #6 succeeded at 1490 (offset 25 lines). Hunk #7 FAILED at 1522. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1608 (offset 26 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 1628 (offset 29 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 1640 (offset 26 lines). 2 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to cfi_cmdset_0001.c.rej -- dwmw2