From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: ajlennon@arcom.co.uk
Subject: CPU caching of flash regions.
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 15:15:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27217.989849725@redhat.com> (raw)
I've just seen profiling of a system mounting JFFS2 filesystem which shows
that the majority of the time is spend in the map driver's copy_from
function.
The copy_from() functions are currently using a completely uncached mapping
of the flash chip, but in fact for reading the chip that's not strictly
necessary. This is especially true during the initial scan.
I think we ought to allow map drivers to do intelligent caching of bus
accesses. Suggested semantics:
1. Only the copy_from() and copy_to() functions can use a cacheable mapping.
2. Any access to the chip through one of the other ({read,write}{8,16,32})
functions causes the cache to be flushed for the entire mapping.
If a cache flush is expensive, a mapping driver may optimise the flushes and
perform a cache flush only if the cache is expected to be non-empty.
This approach is fairly simple, and allows mapping drivers to do something
closely approximating the "right thing" without adding complexity to the
chip driver code. An alternative, which I'm dubious about, is to add
explicit cache management functionality to the methods exported by the
mapping drivers, and to have the chip driver explicitly turn the cache
on/off and flush parts of it when writing/erasing.
Comments?
--
dwmw2
next reply other threads:[~2001-05-14 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-14 14:15 David Woodhouse [this message]
2001-05-14 15:51 ` CPU caching of flash regions Eric W. Biederman
2001-05-14 16:17 ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-14 16:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-05-15 10:46 ` Alex Lennon
2001-05-15 14:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27217.989849725@redhat.com \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ajlennon@arcom.co.uk \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox