From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17chYM-0004Bz-00 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 08:17:50 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <000d01c23e95$4c679060$1b0448c0@gv.com.tw> References: <000d01c23e95$4c679060$1b0448c0@gv.com.tw> To: "??" Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: will jffs2 write to device when doing "read-only" operation like "ls"? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 08:17:46 +0100 Message-ID: <27538.1028791066@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: kevin@gv.com.tw said: > will jffs2 write to device when doing "read-only" operation like "ls"? > for example, if you do a "ls -lR" then a fs like ext2/minix will write > stuff to block device (because of put_inode operation),thus might > reduce life of nand flash....... Normal file systems write because they have to update the 'atime' (access time) field whenever an inode is read. Very few applications actually care about a correct atime, and JFFS2 does not implement atime. -- dwmw2