From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from majordomo by infradead.org with local (Exim 3.20 #2) id 14g7xD-0003RT-00 for mtd-list@infradead.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:28:51 +0000 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #2) id 14g7xC-0003RN-00 for mtd@infradead.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:28:50 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: References: To: =?iso-8859-1?B?S+FyaSBEYXbt8HNzb24=?= Cc: mtd@infradead.org Subject: Re: mtd_info_t.erasesize Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:23:31 +0000 Message-ID: <28264.985278211@redhat.com> Sender: owner-mtd@infradead.org List-ID: kd@flaga.is said: > Yes but I do not totally agree with that logic. It assumes that the > erasesize is the size of the biggest sector in the flashdevice. The actual erase sizes are listed in the struct mtd_info. They're not yet exported to userspace. An ioctl to do that would be useful. -- dwmw2 To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org