Re: Disk blocks for long periods

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>]

joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se said:
>  You can move the wake_up() call up one step(xxxx_write_words()) and
> call it just before  you leave that function. I tried that and it's a
> improvement(note, I using buffer writes, so word writes should see an
> even better improvement), but that will also hold reads back(not that
> I noticed anything) until xxx_write_words has completed.  We can fix
> that by having separate wait queues for read and erase. 

Aren't reads held back anyway for the same reason that erases are -- by the 
time we actually schedule after waking them, the chip is in FL_WRITING 
again?

What happens if you stick a cond_resched() immediately after the wake_up() 
(ok, after the spin_unlock).?

--
dwmw2