From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 18Ns21-0003TG-00 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:59:25 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <43CB1396676FD4119F03001083FD299401A1C8D5@neptune.kirkland.local> References: <43CB1396676FD4119F03001083FD299401A1C8D5@neptune.kirkland.local> To: Paul Nash Cc: Wolfgang Denk , "Linux-MTD (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Intel sez: Synchronous Flash and XIP is the future -- thought s? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:30:04 +0000 Message-ID: <2859.1040034604@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: paulnash@wildseed.com said: > Actually, Intel's L18/L30 series of "wireless flash" has that feature, > Read-while-erase-or-write as long as the reads are not to the 8MBit > partition being dealt with in an erase or write. 1MiB is slightly saner but still not wonderful. At least I suppose it would allow you to have your kernel in the first MiB and hence not affected by changes to the file system. Doing it at an erase-block granularity would be better. -- dwmw2