From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 177F8Y-0007NZ-00 for ; Mon, 13 May 2002 13:41:10 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <001e01c1f73d$8a53ad90$9702a8c0@maverick> References: <001e01c1f73d$8a53ad90$9702a8c0@maverick> To: "Darren Martz" Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Boot from DoC2000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 13:41:05 +0100 Message-ID: <28613.1021293665@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: dmartz@shelbrook.com said: > I have read about jffs1 and jffs2, and from what I can tell jffs1 is > stable but lacking the nice features, while jffs2 is very much > experimental but coming along nicely. Forgot to respond to this bit earlier... JFFS2 on NAND is experimental. JFFS2 on NOR is stable; more so than JFFS1 now, I think. -- dwmw2