From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from majordomo by infradead.org with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 148J2w-0000Hh-00 for mtd-list@infradead.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:26:58 +0000 Received: from [195.224.55.237] (helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 148J2u-0000Hb-00 for mtd@infradead.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:26:57 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <0012182131432A.11759@www.easysolutions.net> References: <0012182131432A.11759@www.easysolutions.net> To: shane@agendacomputing.com Cc: Nicolas Pitre , mstumpf@pobox.com, mtd@infradead.org Subject: Re: MTD, generic physmap memory, MTD_BLOCK Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:24:18 +0000 Message-ID: <29168.977217858@redhat.com> Sender: owner-mtd@infradead.org List-ID: shane@agendacomputing.com said: > But we are working on XIP for cramfs. But this requires either > expanding the inode, or stealing a bit or two away from GIDS, or > UIDs. This is only a "linear addressing" patch. I was looking at doing it in romfs. You can't have compression anyway, for obvious reasons, and it looked a little easier. But I suppose that wouldn't allow you to mix XIP-able and compressed files in the same fs. -- dwmw2 To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org