From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 15uDCz-00062v-00 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:27:37 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <3BCED9DB.28F7D365@uniquemodem.com> References: <3BCED9DB.28F7D365@uniquemodem.com> <3BCD84E1.4DD484A6@uniquemodem.com> <25716.1003325012@redhat.com> To: data Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: mtdblock.c cannot compile under Linux 2.2.x Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:36:47 +0100 Message-ID: <29521.1003412207@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: data@uniquemodem.com said: > Thanks for your reply. However, I don't quite catch your meaning for > don't apply the patch which adds the init calls. Could you please > elaborate further? You applied a patch which added calls to init_jffs_fs() and init_mtd()? Revert it. Otherwise, it may be the compatibility module_init() stuff going wrong. > Secondly, I have encountered another error in mtdblock.c for subscribt > out of range. Could you please het me to have a look. Looks broke. Should be obvious if you go and poke around at the compatibility macros. -- dwmw2