From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0058CCD5BD0 for ; Tue, 26 May 2026 10:39:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Q66xqDHPKC611qETGifV/3euq8KZgh7Z9xsGvpqegOA=; b=g1qYy2Ptervm6B Q/oolvjlNYEMmOr1pHuf0ur+KHxTVnr/TbpAJgVmja8/MUU0wWhJrMLnFtEvEZvkQuZ0UCmDJzjhz X3oW6xvqZMTKFfd5a4nK1bKZJH3O6Ofmmc0fg8N5FPns//YLzkZ8LtJUtwpJ2cgETicTJBKjnaego AdoBBPWwMhFT+hGRlMWyS2bNVKhB3Kesw27zz8IYzGLiDNhJl0gxqUM6w0XR0Gk4II8XC7BFL4sqK 3U8Ztw4WKg4ODh5X2vAdb707242yhr4XOw09lwZWsHL87xHfpIUZSco6PmzKTvGS3Jpp/lV2Z2Tsv a+3rxmcg9tvNJAFY6nZA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wRpBq-00000001fem-3Kqe; Tue, 26 May 2026 10:39:14 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wRpBp-00000001feS-20ml for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 26 May 2026 10:39:13 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45BD6008A; Tue, 26 May 2026 10:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E61761F000E9; Tue, 26 May 2026 10:39:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779791952; bh=azs2doTn6WRcYeDt2Z4GFWdIIH9QPs8kBk3Pel10+sg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=FESVv6KmUcG9mG5Val3ZWzwaoCbxIW1TDDMFUzHpao8wF25ZG7ukaHj6TbohtehGB ep0rgCAzaaV5mOlavkP1E5/bas4By3CpxMdnlLvcaR28FE4Vz9sTq0oZHUGbyGTMn6 ypXswy17YuWTuva6bSVoj3pU0XRitbc90haYGUFbf+D1MM5Z10e+D9wTkqyiAwDYHt SVjAm5aGSnI9e7JToacTBktRYu2p46jVjkF31GNbTCDHstcQGdZFbzrVLgLxYuGF3s Q6UjQ90f/v5RZa4WQFq+PmNBsS+2RHnqqYDTl3l/J0yIZKNTMRH1/2+gCQ/2C1+Wwm Eunr4anIacNvg== From: Pratyush Yadav To: Miquel Raynal Cc: Tudor Ambarus , Pratyush Yadav , Michael Walle , Takahiro Kuwano , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Sean Anderson , Thomas Petazzoni , Steam Lin , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/28] mtd: spi-nor: swp: Improve locking user experience In-Reply-To: <87o6i7o0tj.fsf@bootlin.com> (Miquel Raynal's message of "Fri, 22 May 2026 18:39:52 +0200") References: <20260507-winbond-v6-18-rc1-spi-nor-swp-v5-0-93453e1a9597@bootlin.com> <20260507-winbond-v6-18-rc1-spi-nor-swp-v5-4-93453e1a9597@bootlin.com> <9432f07f-3724-4257-b6ab-84721e619f78@linaro.org> <875x4fphgr.fsf@bootlin.com> <779f2680-2c67-4bbd-9576-bde8e83d111d@linaro.org> <87o6i7o0tj.fsf@bootlin.com> Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 12:39:08 +0200 Message-ID: <2vxz8q965ub7.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, May 22 2026, Miquel Raynal wrote: >>> Technically speaking all four first patches are fixes, except I don't >>> ask the first one to be backported. The reason why we ask fixes to be >>> first in the series is because we want them to be as independent as >>> possible from previous cleanups/changes. Here each four first patch are >>> targeting completely different places and should not interact with each >>> other. Anyway, I will re-shuffle the patches. >> >> you don't need to resend just for that I think. Pratyush or Michael can >> re-shuffle when applying. > > It's a bit painful to do while applying, I will send a v6. I didn't get what we want to shuffle. Do you want to have this patch as 03/28 and "mtd: spi-nor: Make sure the QE bit is kept enabled if useful" as 04/28? If only that, I can do this myself when applying. And here's what I am thinking: the first 9 patches are reviewed and good to go. I want to land them in this merge window so we cut down your patchset and land stuff sooner. Unfortunately I just can't seem to find time to review this series so I hope this helps some at least. -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/