From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17IcFO-0002tS-00 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:35:14 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20020613161907.87873.qmail@web21503.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20020613161907.87873.qmail@web21503.mail.yahoo.com> To: Studying MTD Cc: linux-mtd Subject: Re: why MTD model ? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:34:52 +0100 Message-ID: <30266.1024004092@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: studying_mtd@yahoo.com said: > Can somehow we treat(emulate) memory device as a block device and > treat memory device like a hard disk ? Not directly, no. There are drivers which do so -- and present a flash device as a block device using translation layers of various complexity, but that is not a true representation of the capabilities of the underlying device. -- dwmw2