public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix synced_i_size calculation for xattr inodes
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:46:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3040988.j6LFxaOeXC@blindfold> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180214110248.26325-1-richard@nod.at>

Am Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2018, 12:02:48 CET schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> In ubifs_jnl_update() we sync parent and child inodes to the flash,
> in case of xattrs, the parent inode (AKA host inode) has a non-zero
> data_len. Therefore we need to adjust synced_i_size too.
> 
> This issue was reported by ubifs self tests unter a xattr related work
> load.
> UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 1896): dbg_check_synced_i_size: ui_size is 4,
> synced_i_size is 0, but inode is clean UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 1896):
> dbg_check_synced_i_size: i_ino 65, i_mode 0x81a4, i_size 4
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Fixes: 1e51764a3c2a ("UBIFS: add new flash file system")
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> ---
>  fs/ubifs/journal.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/journal.c b/fs/ubifs/journal.c
> index 04c4ec6483e5..e3e1e093db81 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/journal.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/journal.c
> @@ -664,6 +664,8 @@ int ubifs_jnl_update(struct ubifs_info *c, const struct
> inode *dir, finish_reservation(c);
>  	spin_lock(&ui->ui_lock);
>  	ui->synced_i_size = ui->ui_size;
> +	if (xent)
> +		host_ui->synced_i_size = host_ui->ui_size;
>  	spin_unlock(&ui->ui_lock);

Reviewing my own patch on LKML helps a lot.
We need to take host_ui->ui_lock too...

Thanks,
//richard

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-14 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-14 11:02 [PATCH] ubifs: Fix synced_i_size calculation for xattr inodes Richard Weinberger
2018-02-14 12:46 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-11 22:52 Richard Weinberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3040988.j6LFxaOeXC@blindfold \
    --to=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox