From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16c5qR-00075H-00 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 14:29:43 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <003a01c1b6de$e88a0980$f801a8c0@minibm> References: <003a01c1b6de$e88a0980$f801a8c0@minibm> To: "Chung Ming" Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: "No Flash Chips Recognized." error. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 14:40:42 +0000 Message-ID: <30500.1013870442@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: min@hello.org said: > Hi David, now I can't get any reply from this DoC millenium, no > "DiskOnChip found at address.." anymore just "possible DoC with unknow > chipID found at ....." . At what physical address is the DiskOnChip? -- dwmw2