From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 15rNBp-0002aT-00 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:30:41 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: References: To: martin.kula@deltaes.cz Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Eraseblock size in jffs2 ? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:39:49 +0100 Message-ID: <30602.1002735589@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: martin.kula@deltaes.cz said: > If jffs2 doesn't work should I use the same procedure with jffs(v1)? > I'm very confused with it because when I use eraseall on the mtd0 > device than I erase MBR and so too ? I won't be able to boot from > this, will I ? Yes, it would take out all the firmware, but the firmware wouldn't have let you boot from JFFS or JFFS2 anyway. > What filesystem is probably the best for DoC now ? Probably best just to use NFTL on it and a normal filesystem on top of that. -- dwmw2