From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17Zoi8-0006HG-00 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:20:00 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: References: To: acurtis@directvinternet.com Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: What happened to 64-bit support? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:19:58 +0100 Message-ID: <31698.1028103598@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: acurtis@directvinternet.com said: > In theory yes. if CONFIG_MTD_CFI_B8 translates to 64-bits in config > (which I believe it does, then yes) As I mentioned, the problem > appears to be in the probe routines not liking an octet of 8. What exactly happens? -- dwmw2