From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 15ISmp-00065f-00 for ; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 11:24:35 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <3B460280.9060805@niisi.msk.ru> References: <3B460280.9060805@niisi.msk.ru> To: Alexandr Andreev Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infrared.org" Subject: Re: FTL and Endianity Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 11:30:07 +0100 Message-ID: <31888.994415407@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: andreev@niisi.msk.ru said: > Did anybody test FTL with big endian CPU? If no, we need to throw > these macros out. In any case, we have to be able to configure this > behaviour. I didn't test - I think others did though. FTL is defined to be little-endian. Why do you say the macros are unusable? -- dwmw2