From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 152Veu-0005wX-00 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:14:28 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: References: To: Jan Rovins Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Steve Ferri Subject: Re: MTD on a Motorola MPCN765 ? (32 bit linux and 64 bit flash) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 11:18:31 +0100 Message-ID: <32329.990613111@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Jan.Rovins@radisys.com said: > I was using partitions before, mostly to isolate & protect the boot > image. Can I have a setup that uses separately mapped devices and > multiple partitions at the same time? (I am having trouble visualizing > this) Yeah, that's fine. You just call add_mtd_partitions() twice. > Separate chip mappings also would imply that I would have to alter > the read(), write() copy_to/from() functions to skip over the bytes > that would show up in the other mapping, since my address lines are > wired up to treat the four chips as one range. Yep. -- dwmw2