Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: dataflash: Improve coding style in jedec_probe()

[Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>]

On 04/18/2017 04:21 PM, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> As per request from Marek Vasut, change the following:

Does that really have to be in the commit message ? ^_^'

>    - Replace indentation between type and name of local variable from
>      tabs to spaces
> 
>    - Replace magic number 0x1F with CFI_MFR_ATMEL macro
> 
>    - Replace variable 'tmp' with 'ret' and 'i' where appropriate
> 
>    - Reformat multi-line comments and add newlines where appropriate
> 
> No functional change intended.

Appreciated, thanks!

Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>

> Cc: cphealy@gmail.com
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/devices/mtd_dataflash.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/mtd_dataflash.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/mtd_dataflash.c
> index a566231..5b7a8c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/mtd_dataflash.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/mtd_dataflash.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@
>  #define OP_WRITE_SECURITY_REVC	0x9A
>  #define OP_WRITE_SECURITY	0x9B	/* revision D */
>  
> +#define CFI_MFR_ATMEL		0x1F
>  
>  struct dataflash {
>  	u8			command[4];
> @@ -738,14 +739,15 @@ static struct flash_info dataflash_data[] = {
>  
>  static struct flash_info *jedec_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  {
> -	int			tmp;
> -	u8			code = OP_READ_ID;
> -	u8			id[3];
> -	u32			jedec;
> -	struct flash_info	*info;
> +	int ret, i;
> +	u8 code = OP_READ_ID;
> +	u8 id[3];
> +	u32 jedec;
> +	struct flash_info *info;
>  	int status;
>  
> -	/* JEDEC also defines an optional "extended device information"
> +	/*
> +	 * JEDEC also defines an optional "extended device information"
>  	 * string for after vendor-specific data, after the three bytes
>  	 * we use here.  Supporting some chips might require using it.
>  	 *
> @@ -753,13 +755,14 @@ static struct flash_info *jedec_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  	 * That's not an error; only rev C and newer chips handle it, and
>  	 * only Atmel sells these chips.
>  	 */
> -	tmp = spi_write_then_read(spi, &code, 1, id, 3);
> -	if (tmp < 0) {
> +	ret = spi_write_then_read(spi, &code, 1, id, 3);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
>  		pr_debug("%s: error %d reading JEDEC ID\n",
> -			dev_name(&spi->dev), tmp);
> -		return ERR_PTR(tmp);
> +			dev_name(&spi->dev), ret);
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  	}
> -	if (id[0] != 0x1f)
> +
> +	if (id[0] != CFI_MFR_ATMEL)
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	jedec = id[0];
> @@ -768,9 +771,9 @@ static struct flash_info *jedec_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  	jedec = jedec << 8;
>  	jedec |= id[2];
>  
> -	for (tmp = 0, info = dataflash_data;
> -			tmp < ARRAY_SIZE(dataflash_data);
> -			tmp++, info++) {
> +	for (i = 0, info = dataflash_data;
> +			i < ARRAY_SIZE(dataflash_data);
> +			i++, info++) {
>  		if (info->jedec_id == jedec) {
>  			pr_debug("%s: OTP, sector protect%s\n",
>  				dev_name(&spi->dev),
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut