From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from majordomo by infradead.org with local (Exim 3.03 #1) id 13ABC7-0006Fm-00 for mtd-list@infradead.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2000 13:55:55 +0100 Received: from dns.cygnus.co.uk ([194.130.39.3] helo=pasanda.cygnus.co.uk) by infradead.org with smtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 13ABC6-0006Fg-00 for mtd@infradead.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2000 13:55:54 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <396460AB.9BEC2657@crossnet.co.jp> References: <396460AB.9BEC2657@crossnet.co.jp> To: Masami Komiya Cc: mtd@infradead.org Subject: Re: Fujitsu MBM29LV160 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 13:55:48 +0100 Message-ID: <327.962888148@cygnus.co.uk> Sender: owner-mtd@infradead.org List-ID: mkomiya@crossnet.co.jp said: > I want to use FTL and JFFS for our system. These filesystems can be > used on AMD's flash chips? FTL provides a block device, on which you put a 'normal' filesystem. JFFS runs directly on the flash. You don't need both, and FTL is patented in some jurisdictions so you're not permitted to use it on non-PCMCIA devices. mkomiya@crossnet.co.jp said: > Our system has two interleaved flash in 32 bit mode. So I want to > implement only 32bit read & write routines instead of 16 bit if it is > allowed. FTL or JFFS require 16bit read & write routines ? FTL and JFFS can't actually tell what the underlying MTD driver uses to talk to the flash chips. So it doesn't matter. -- dwmw2 To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org