From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16sBz6-00028A-00 for ; Tue, 02 Apr 2002 01:17:12 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <01f601c1d9ce$b9a1e5d0$87657bc8@athlon> References: <01f601c1d9ce$b9a1e5d0$87657bc8@athlon> To: "Derek Ross" Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Are erase suspends possible? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 01:14:01 +0100 Message-ID: <3371.1017706441@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: dross@iders.ca said: > I was looking through the code in cfi_cmdset_0001.c, and it appears > that erase suspends are not implemented. Is this correct? No. Erase suspend has been working for ages. What version of cfi_cmdset_0001.c are you looking at? -- dwmw2