From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lilium.sigma-star.at ([109.75.188.150]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fJdMQ-00034I-Kk for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 18 May 2018 11:15:54 +0000 Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 13:15:32 +0200 (CEST) From: David Oberhollenzer To: Jo-Philipp Wich Cc: Levente , openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org, richard , linux-mtd Message-ID: <351822581.163754.1526642132964.JavaMail.zimbra@sigma-star.at> In-Reply-To: <73497de5-6ea1-2662-2cc1-c5047e29d865@mein.io> References: <967434303.163429.1526634595483.JavaMail.zimbra@sigma-star.at> <1397936863.163523.1526636992502.JavaMail.zimbra@sigma-star.at> <73497de5-6ea1-2662-2cc1-c5047e29d865@mein.io> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT mtd tooling vs mtd-utils MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Thanks for the clarification! Just out of curiosity, is there a specific reason why OpenWRT uses its own formatting utility here instead of using the tools from mtd-utils? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jo-Philipp Wich" To: "David Oberhollenzer" , "Levente" , openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Cc: "richard" , "linux-mtd" Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 12:26:48 PM Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT mtd tooling vs mtd-utils Hello David, this was actually my fault. I didn't pay close attention and assumed the code to be related to the kernel MTD subsystem. Only now after your mail I realized that it affects the OpenWrt specific formatting utility. I am very sorry for the confusion caused. Kind regards, Jo