Re: Question about ubiformat and how to better use UBIFS

[Konstantin Tokarev <annulen@yandex.ru>]

04.09.2014, 16:21, "t kevin" <kevint324@gmail.com>:
> Hi ,
>
> Currently I'm trying to create ubifs for rootfs on my device which has
> a Nand flash on board.
>
> Right now I know two approaches to do that.
> 1. On host,mkfs.ubifs+ubinize to generate one ubi.img. On target
> board, ubiformat -f ubi.img on the MTD device, ubiattach then mount
> and it's done.
> or
> 2. On host, just tar -cz rootfs to generate root.tgz. On target board,
> (for the first time)ubiformat the mtd device, ubiattach,ubimkvol, then
> mount ubifs. Then untar the root.tgz to the mounted ubi volume.
>
> Eventually the mountpoint should contain same files.
>
> So here are my questions.
> 1. (Generally speaking) Which one is better? I know ubiformat is going
> to erase every PEB  so right now I prefer the second approach since I
> don't have to do ubiformat everytime. It sounds like the erase counter
> grows slower.
>
> 2. I'm working on an embedded device which has limited CPU power so
> I'd like to use compressed_method=none. It can be done by passing -x
> none to mkfs.ubifs. But I don't see similar option in ubiformat or
> ubimkvol. So when I go to the 2nd approach the mounted rootfs is
> always compressed.
> http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/ubifs.html#L_comproff
> This method is not helping much. I want to disable compression on the
> entire fs, just like mkfs.ubifs -x none did.
>

Why do you want to do ubiformat everytime? You can prepare UBIFS image with
mkfs.ubifs and flash it with ubiupdatevol to existing UBI volume.


-- 
Regards,
Konstantin