linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Adding OTP-only device to MTD or CHAR subsystem?
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:38:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3668194.4jROlECW6L@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5681C3E4.4090506@broadcom.com>

On Monday 28 December 2015 15:21:08 Scott Branden wrote:
> Greg/Brian/Arnd,
> 
> We have OTP device drivers for accessing OTP memory in our SoCs.
> 
> I looking for the right place and model to place such OTP device drivers.
> 
> 1) Should we follow the bfin-otp model in drivers/char?  This doesn't 
> seem like the right place to put it although following the bfin example 
> is quite simple to implement.  We actually had a custom set of Ioctl's 
> that I changed to use the standard file access model used by the bfin 
> driver.  But a custom util is still needed to issue an OTPLOCK command. 
>   I'm guess mtd-utils has such abilities (or should).
> 
> 2) Instead, should we start adding OTP-only drivers into the MTD 
> subsystem?  Onenand and CFI based MTD devices already have OTP 
> programmable regions.  If we created a new OTP device type in the MTD 
> subsystem this looks like a good thing to do.  mtd-utils could/should be 
> used to access the OTP device then along with standard fileio operations.
> 
> 3) Or some other suggestion of where to place OTP device drivers?

I think drivers/nvmem is now the right place for this.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-28 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-28 23:21 Adding OTP-only device to MTD or CHAR subsystem? Scott Branden
2015-12-28 23:38 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-12-29  0:32   ` Scott Branden
2016-01-09 11:13     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-01-13 22:05       ` Scott Branden

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3668194.4jROlECW6L@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).