* Patched LILO problems
@ 2000-05-24 21:55 Patrick Higgins
2000-05-25 9:06 ` Dvir Oren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Higgins @ 2000-05-24 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mtd
I'm using the binary patched LILO from mtd/patches/lilo-mtd.tar.gz, and it
doesn't seem to pass the correct command line to kernel. The parameters I
specify in the lilo.conf are totally ignored, and after the system boots,
cat'ing /proc/cmdline shows that it's full of 0xff's. Has anyone had
similar problems, or know what might be going on?
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Patched LILO problems
2000-05-24 21:55 Patched LILO problems Patrick Higgins
@ 2000-05-25 9:06 ` Dvir Oren
2000-05-25 19:49 ` Mr. Oogie Boogie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dvir Oren @ 2000-05-25 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick Higgins; +Cc: MTD
Patrick Higgins writes ("Patched LILO problems"):
> I'm using the binary patched LILO from mtd/patches/lilo-mtd.tar.gz, and it
> doesn't seem to pass the correct command line to kernel. The parameters I
Yes. I noticed that the patched LILO does not in fact pass parameters
(well, the only ones I used were root=) to the kernel. For my purposes,
I just rdev each kernel.
Perhaps it would be a good idea to go over the patches and see if it
destroys something.
--
Dvir Oren <dviro@lucidvon.com>
Lucid VON Ltd. <http://www.lucidvon.com>
9 Saloniki St., Tel-Aviv Israel
Tel: +972 3 644 3038 Fax: +972 3 644 3039
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Patched LILO problems
2000-05-25 9:06 ` Dvir Oren
@ 2000-05-25 19:49 ` Mr. Oogie Boogie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mr. Oogie Boogie @ 2000-05-25 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mtd; +Cc: dviro, phiggins
Dvir Oren wrote:
>
> Patrick Higgins writes ("Patched LILO problems"):
>
> > I'm using the binary patched LILO from mtd/patches/lilo-mtd.tar.gz, and it
> > doesn't seem to pass the correct command line to kernel. The parameters I
>
> Yes. I noticed that the patched LILO does not in fact pass parameters
> (well, the only ones I used were root=) to the kernel. For my purposes,
> I just rdev each kernel.
>
> Perhaps it would be a good idea to go over the patches and see if it
> destroys something.
I had this problem as well. This was a few months ago so my memory is
a little fuzzy. The patch I used I downloaded from M-systems. I
mucked around with it to try and find why the command line got mangled
and discovered that it passes the command line correctly when I booted
from a hard drive (the hd was a mirror image of the DoC) or from a
floppy with the DoC as root, so I'm pretty sure it is not the patch.
I gave up in frustration and hard coded the command line I wanted into
the kernel. I'd like a better solution, so if you find one please let
me know.
--
Ralph A. Preston
The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road, MS E015
Bedford, MA 01730-1420
Work: 781-271-7914 Fax: 781-271-8875 Cell: 617-257-2695
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-05-25 19:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-05-24 21:55 Patched LILO problems Patrick Higgins
2000-05-25 9:06 ` Dvir Oren
2000-05-25 19:49 ` Mr. Oogie Boogie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox