From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from majordomo by infradead.org with local (Exim 3.20 #2) id 14AW3B-0001Kj-00 for mtd-list@infradead.org; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 11:44:21 +0000 Message-ID: <3A473302.74DD6A6B@auriga.ru> Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 14:44:02 +0300 From: Nick Ivanter MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse CC: mark.langsdorf@amd.com, mtd@infradead.org Subject: Re: CFI ident problems with AMD chips. References: <4883.977501550@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-mtd@infradead.org List-ID: They surely have differnet Device ID's which can be found in a datasheet and compared with the reported ones. Nick David Woodhouse wrote: > Hi, > > I've now started using AMD chips. I have a chip which I believe to be a > 4MiB part with TOP boot blocks. Should be 63*64KiB erase regions followed by > 8*8KiB erase regions. > > However, the CFI "Erase Block Region" information reports them in the wrong > order - the 8*8KiB blocks _before_ the 63*64KiB. > > Is there some way to tell the top-boot parts apart from the bottom-boot > parts? > > -- > dwmw2 > > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org