From: "Stéphane Laroche" <stephane.laroche@colubris.com>
To: mtd@infradead.org
Subject: CFI problems with 32bit bus and 4 devices
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:15:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A5CB4C3.41FC20D1@colubris.com> (raw)
Hi,
I've just updated to the latest CVS and my CFI AMD chips are not
accessible anymore.
I lokked briefly into it and saw that the cfi->interleave and
cfi->device_type were removed from offset calculations when accessing
the devices.
So, for my setup, which has 4 x16 devices on a 32 bit bus (AMDs), the
CFI query structure is located at offsets 0x80, 0x88, 0x90, etc.
cfi_read_query() uses only the buswidth to calculate the offset, which
is not general enough (it used to be like that before I played with the
code a bit last summer). It's obviously wrong in my case ( 0x10 << 2 !=
0x80 ).
Rewriting cfi_read_query like this made the CFI query structure
readable:
static inline __u8 cfi_read_query(struct map_info *map, __u32 base,
__u32 addr)
{
struct cfi_private *cfi = map->fldrv_priv;
addr *= cfi->interleave * cfi->device_type; /* instead of addr <<
(buswidth / 2) */
if (cfi_buswidth_is_1()) {
return map->read8(map, base + addr);
} else if (cfi_buswidth_is_2()) {
return cfi16_to_cpu(map->read16(map, base + addr));
} else if (cfi_buswidth_is_4()) {
return cfi32_to_cpu(map->read32(map, base + addr));
} else {
return 0;
}
}
With this change, the chips are now properly recognized. But I can't
still not use them (reads are wrong), so I think I have to look at
cfi_cmdset_002.c to bring back the use of cfi->interleave in some
calculations...
Any comments? Is it possible that I'm the only one using that kind of
geometry?
-Stephane
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org
next reply other threads:[~2001-01-10 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-10 19:15 Stéphane Laroche [this message]
2001-01-10 20:13 ` CFI problems with 32bit bus and 4 devices Nicolas Pitre
2001-01-10 20:37 ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-10 21:06 ` Stéphane Laroche
2001-01-10 22:35 ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-10 21:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2001-01-10 22:22 ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-10 22:39 ` Stéphane Laroche
2001-01-10 23:06 ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-11 0:21 ` Nicolas Pitre
2001-01-10 23:34 ` Alice Hennessy
2001-01-10 23:55 ` Alice Hennessy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-10 22:45 Michael Thompson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A5CB4C3.41FC20D1@colubris.com \
--to=stephane.laroche@colubris.com \
--cc=mtd@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox