From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from majordomo by infradead.org with local (Exim 3.20 #2) id 14sK32-00072i-00 for mtd-list@infradead.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:49:16 +0100 Received: from fw.crossnet.co.jp ([210.254.215.158] helo=cirrus.crossnet.co.jp) by infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #2) id 14sK30-00072c-00 for mtd@infradead.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:49:14 +0100 Received: from crossnet.co.jp (nimbus [192.168.77.96]) by cirrus.crossnet.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA25652 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 16:49:27 +0900 Message-ID: <3AE68917.88DE6614@crossnet.co.jp> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 17:21:43 +0900 From: Masami Komiya MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mtd@infradead.org Subject: Strange addr_unlock denitions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-mtd@infradead.org List-ID: I think cfi_probe_chip() in cfi_probe.c should be changed as attached patch. What do you say about this ? Masami Komiya diff -c cfi_probe.c.org cfi_probe.c *** cfi_probe.c.org Wed Apr 18 17:26:35 2001 --- cfi_probe.c Mon Apr 23 19:47:25 2001 *************** *** 198,209 **** switch (cfi->device_type) { case CFI_DEVICETYPE_X8: - cfi->addr_unlock1=0x555; - cfi->addr_unlock2=0x2aa; - break; - case CFI_DEVICETYPE_X16: cfi->addr_unlock1=0xaaa; cfi->addr_unlock2=0x555; break; case CFI_DEVICETYPE_X32: cfi->addr_unlock1=0x1555; --- 198,209 ---- switch (cfi->device_type) { case CFI_DEVICETYPE_X8: cfi->addr_unlock1=0xaaa; cfi->addr_unlock2=0x555; + break; + case CFI_DEVICETYPE_X16: + cfi->addr_unlock1=0x555; + cfi->addr_unlock2=0x2aa; break; case CFI_DEVICETYPE_X32: cfi->addr_unlock1=0x1555; To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org