From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.18] helo=mailout04.sul.t-online.de) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 15ESbU-0004tu-00 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:24:20 +0100 Message-ID: <3B370454.AABE4AA1@t-online.de> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:28:52 +0200 From: attingimus@t-online.de (Rene Burgdorf) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: M-Systems DOC vs. Apacer ATA-Disk Chip (ADC) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------6C94E1FCAD5EBCE426BD6901" Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------6C94E1FCAD5EBCE426BD6901 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I have to decide which flash device to use to boot linux in an embedded pc. At first glance the ADC from Apacer (http://www.apacer.com) seems to be a simple and strait forward way as it behaves like an ATA disk. Do I overlook an important aspect? Why should I choose a DOC? Thank you for your comments. Regards Rene --------------6C94E1FCAD5EBCE426BD6901 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="attingimus.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Rene Burgdorf Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="attingimus.vcf" begin:vcard n:Burgdorf;Rene tel;fax:+49 531 344613 tel;work:+49 531 344601 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:Attingimus Nachrichtentechnik GmbH adr:;;Bismarckstr. 15;38102 Braunschweig;;;Germany version:2.1 email;internet:attingimus@t-online.de note;quoted-printable:HRB 4159 beim AG BS=0D=0A=0D=0A x-mozilla-cpt:;-18592 fn:Rene Burgdorf end:vcard --------------6C94E1FCAD5EBCE426BD6901--