From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [213.97.115.166] (helo=madrid.hispafuentes.com ident=postfix) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 15RzoY-0006ql-00 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2001 18:29:47 +0100 Message-ID: <3B683DE3.72CB56F3@hispafuentes.com> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 19:35:31 +0200 From: olea@hispafuentes.com MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" Cc: juan@hispafuentes.com Subject: Re: Problems compiling kernel 2.2.17 References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010801063242.00a67f20@mail.spewey.com> <3B67EDFD.E19F6F6D@hispafuentes.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Juan and me were talking about our difficult compiling the cvs MTD with the 2.2.17 kernel must be due to use a wrong cvs branch. Do you maintain separate developer and stable branchs of MTD? If not, and if there isn't a dependences conflict in the kernel .config we can't explain why we can't compile MTD with the nftl support :-? -- A.Ismael Olea González tlf +(34) 914 575 330 mailto:olea@hispafuentes.com