From: Alexandru Harsanyi <a.harsanyi@willhart-tech.com>
To: Linux Mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: DOC 2000 driver (NFTL) in kernel 2.4.7
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 12:30:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B70C06D.5908CAC8@willhart-tech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 30960.997176999@redhat.com
Hi,
I updated to the lastest CVS, and moved the driver code into the 2.4.7
kernel source.
At boot I get the following messages (debug verbosity was set to 3):
M-Systems DiskOnChip driver. (C) 1999 Machine Vision Holdings, Inc.
DiskOnChip 2000 found at address 0xC8000
Flash chip found: Manufacturer ID: 98, Chip ID: 6B (Toshiba TC5832DC)
3 flash chips found. Total DiskOnChip size: 12 MiB
mtd: Giving out device 0 to DiskOnChip 2000
NFTL driver: nftlcore.c $Revision: 1.77 $, nftlmount.c $Revision: 1.20 $
NFTL_notify_add for DiskOnChip 2000
mtd->read = c0181a20, size = 12582912, erasesize = 8192
NFTL_setup
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
ANAND header found at 0xc000 in mtd0, but ECC read failed (err 1)
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
ANAND header found at 0xe000 in mtd0, but ECC read failed (err 1)
Could not find valid boot record
Could not mount NFTL device
----------
It seems to me that there's an ECC error when reading the DOC. With the
M-Systems provided driver, the chip works fine, so I suspect there's a
problem at the ECC computation. That would explain why, when formating
the chip with the linux-mtd tools it works (as Saul Thurrowgood
<saul@cvs.anu.edu.au> reported)
It would be interesting to test whether a chip formated with linux-mtd
tools works with the M-System provided driver.
My DOC was formated using M-Systems tools and the partitions on it are
MS-DOS. For non-technical reasons I cannot reformat the chip.
Best Regards,
Alex.
David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> saul@cvs.anu.edu.au said:
> > I fixed it by formatting with nftl_format (also comes with MTD
> > source), providing it a 240k offset so it would not trash the BIOS at
> > the beginning of the chip (Ampro specific).
>
> That's normally 48KiB for the standard on-device firmware, I think.
>
> > Works fine! So, what's the difference between the two formats?!? Both
> > start at the exact same place on the DOC, as seen by running nftldump
> > before and after.
>
> Please upgrade to the latest version from CVS (nftlmount.c v1.20). It'll be
> a lot more explicit about its reasons for rejecting any media headers which
> it finds.
>
> --
> dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-08 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E15RXGo-00058Q-00@pentafluge.infradead.org>
2001-08-01 3:46 ` DOC 2000 driver (NFTL) in kernel 2.4.7 Saul Thurrowgood
2001-08-07 9:36 ` David Woodhouse
2001-08-08 4:30 ` Alexandru Harsanyi [this message]
2001-08-08 6:42 ` David Woodhouse
2001-08-08 7:42 ` Alexandru Harsanyi
2001-08-08 8:52 ` David Woodhouse
2001-07-31 4:40 Alexandru Harsanyi
2001-07-31 20:45 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B70C06D.5908CAC8@willhart-tech.com \
--to=a.harsanyi@willhart-tech.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox