From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from viefep16-int.chello.at ([213.46.255.17]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16SnFn-0006cj-00 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:49:27 +0000 Message-ID: <3C4C9AA6.92B91D59@softsys.co.at> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:48:06 +0100 From: Erwin Authried MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse CC: Steve Kranz , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: MTD on linux 2.0.38? References: <3C4C91CD.D9574F9B@ridgerun.com> <4784.1011652929@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I have switched to uClinux-2.4.x a couple of months ago, and I'm afraid that I'll not spend any time on 2.0.38 anymore. I got really sick on backporting all the 2.4 stuff, not only MTD. I have written a small README for patching uClinux-2.0.38 , it's in the MTD folder at http://uclinux.home.at/. There aren't many differences with the "full" 2.0.38 kernel, I hope. -Erwin David Woodhouse schrieb: > > skranz@ridgerun.com said: > > As of many months ago it was my understanding that > > MTD had never been back-ported to the 2.0.38 kernel. > > Is this still the case? > > There are periodic screams of anguish when I break the 2.0 build, and I try > not to - it ought to work without too much pain. Erwin? > > -- > dwmw2