public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikhil Goel <nikhil@smartbridges.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Ramya Ravichandran <rrhsin@yahoo.co.in>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Cf Card vs DiskOnChip
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:16:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C513E7B.6010808@smartbridges.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4181.1011956000@redhat.com

David Woodhouse wrote:

> rrhsin@yahoo.co.in said:
> 
>>industrial environment. I am unable to decide whether to use a Compact
>>Flash card or DiskOnChip.With 128MB I need to get the whole thing
>>running. Can someone plese tell me as which one to use and why? 
> 
> The downside of the DiskOnChip is that the Linux driver doesn't do wear 
> levelling, although it's easy enough to add, and that the vendor's driver 
> is a binary-only module and hence of dubious legality.
> 
> I would go for the DiskOnChip and add wear levelling support - all you need 
> to do it make it randomly pick a clean block for erasure occasionally, to 
> make sure stuff moves around over time.


Isn't that similar to the implementation of JFFS? So a DiskOnChip 
running on the CVS based driver with JFFS should suffice for 
wear-levelling! if I am missing some piece here, what should I rtfm?

regards,
nikhil



-- 

-- 
Nikhil Goel <nikhil@smartbridges.com>
Ph: +65 3240210  Ext 20, Fax: +65 3240607
Reality is a crutch for those who can't handle science fiction.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-25 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-25 10:39 Cf Card vs DiskOnChip Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-25 10:53 ` David Woodhouse
2002-01-25 11:16   ` Nikhil Goel [this message]
2002-01-25 11:57     ` David Woodhouse
2002-01-25 16:26   ` Richard Gooch
2002-01-25 16:50     ` David Woodhouse
2002-01-26  4:19       ` Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-26  5:49         ` Russ Dill
2002-01-26  6:19           ` Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-26 12:25         ` kira brown
2002-01-25 11:42 ` kira brown
2002-01-25 12:33   ` Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-25 13:23     ` Robert Schwebel
2002-01-25 22:28       ` Chris Fowler
2002-01-25 14:14     ` Johan Adolfsson
2002-01-25 14:15       ` kira brown
     [not found] <1012026130.25150.0.camel@russ>
2002-01-26  6:29 ` Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-26  7:31   ` Charles Manning
2002-01-26  8:05     ` Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-26 13:50       ` kira brown
2002-01-26 20:06       ` Russ Dill
2002-01-28  1:35       ` Charles Manning
2002-01-28  6:18         ` Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-28 17:12           ` Charles Manning
2002-01-28  9:21         ` kira brown
2002-01-28 10:03           ` Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-28 18:46             ` Alessandro Staltari
2002-01-28 10:08           ` Ramya Ravichandran
     [not found]         ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201280914130.9494-100000@hex.linuxgrrls.org >
2002-01-28 15:26           ` Mark Sienkiewicz
2002-01-26  9:16   ` David Woodhouse
2002-01-26 15:03   ` Chris Fowler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C513E7B.6010808@smartbridges.com \
    --to=nikhil@smartbridges.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=rrhsin@yahoo.co.in \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox