From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wall.comdev.cc ([63.150.62.162] helo=cleanup.comdev.cc) by pentafluge.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16WiOj-0007V2-00 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2002 18:26:53 +0000 Message-ID: <3C5ADFC8.BD97CFFF@comdev.cc> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 10:34:48 -0800 From: Adam Wozniak MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse CC: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: debugging strategies for jffs2 References: <3C5AD150.1A3B9AAE@comdev.cc> <20020201142405.79130.qmail@web20309.mail.yahoo.com> <9323.1012576311@redhat.com> <30239.1012586688@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: David Woodhouse wrote: > > adam.wozniak@comdev.cc said: > > I'm trying to debug what I think might be a problem in jffs2 code. > > Is it safe for me to create a new jffs2 image by randomly shuffling > > the erase blocks in an existing jffs2 image? > > > Should that work? > > Yes, it should. The code treats all erase blocks entirely separately. > So much so, in fact, that I'm surprised you think it would be enlightening > to do so. scan.c, 495 return -0; Was that intentional? -- Adam Wozniak (KG6GZR) COM DEV Wireless - Digital and Software Systems awozniak@comdev.cc 3450 Broad St. 107, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 http://www.comdev.cc Voice: (805) 544-1089 Fax: (805) 544-2055